Archive for October, 2009

When is a personal guarantee not a personal guarantee?

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

Delivering services to cash strapped businesses is one of the most delicate and difficult equations. 

One of our service provider clients called me last week for advice.  Our client had been supporting one of its cash strapped customers who had reached its credit limit.  A Director of the customer gave a personal guarantee (verbal) that the outstanding account balance would be paid on an agreed date if our client continued to provide service.  Unfortunately the Director reneged and our client is taking legal action against its customer.

It is a sad state affairs when Directors give personal guarantees  and then renege, however in these modern times where MP’s can no longer be called honourable and when bankers are being routinely jailed in the US why should we be surprised about a little old personal guarantee default.  The depressing  part about this little story is that during the most difficult times of business it is trust which get’s businesses through -  suppliers cut their customers some slack, bankers extend terms, employees cut their pay.  During the difficult times a company in difficulty gets through with the support of its employees, investors, bankers , shareholders and suppliers – all the stakeholders.  The strength of relationships forged during these times will endure for many years to come.  During these times a contract with the most exacting terms does nothing, companies and their directors rely on the strength of their commitments followed then by their actions.  For our client the granting of a personal guarantee could not have been a stronger commitment.

We have been working with many cash strapped customers – helping to manage their cash.  We have found that an honest and open communication technique is the best.  Do not tell a supplier they will be paid at the end of the month when they won’t, do not say you have lost the invoice when you haven’t .  Do part pay invoices.  Do pay small amounts regularly.  Do have senior members of the management team ring and talk to their suppliers.  Do not give personal guarantees and then renege.

This set me thinking about the legal status of a verbal guarantee.  It is important to realise that this is an agreement between an individual director and supplier.  Verbal agreements do have a legal standing, but there must be evidence that terms have been agreed.   The legal advice to our client was that whilst they may have a case to prosecute the individual director for the personal guarantee, it is more straight forward to take insolvency proceedings against the company.  It will be interesting to see what happens it is just possible that the director will have greater assets than the company.

Mike O’Connell, CEO, Isosceles Finance

Role of the Finance Director Part III: The Glue

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

Previous Installment Part II: Painting the Picture

So far we have ascertained that our FD needs to be able to put the people, systems and processes in place to generate the appropriate level of financial information.  We have also discussed the communication and style qualities required.  However these are all very passive, non operational roles. 

An FD should be able to take the information about the business and use it to affect change within the organisation, questioning the conventional wisdom.  The FD needs to be the ‘critical friend’ of all areas of the business.  Asking every manager to look at the cost benefit equation of every area of expenditure or investment.  The trick for an excellent FD is how to do this without interrupting business and without affecting the ability of the company to execute.  Again communication is a key factor, the FD needs to be able to frame why he/she is questioning the expenditure or investment in the bigger picture of the budget or plan. 

The role of the FD is to bring the various elements of the business back to the central plan, but also have the ability to see when the assumptions underlying the plan have changed and be able to model the new scenarios and to change the financial priorities.

In the most successful businesses that I have worked with there has been a healthy tension between the key business functions.  Sales and marketing need to be pushing the boundaries, service or product delivery need to be pushing the boundaries.  Finance needs to be the flexible glue that holds these functions together and prevents them from fracturing.

This is often the most controversial role of the FD.  It is easy to get this part of the role wrong, to stray outside of the FD’s remit for situations to become political.  I believe that this is the last piece of the puzzle.  Dependent upon the situation of the company, the FD must earn the right to challenge the other areas of the business by delivering excellence in the first two parts of the FD role.

Mike O’Connell, CEO, Isosceles Finance